Find a company you can trust

Discover, read, and write reviews

What are you looking for?

Looking to grow your business?

Strengthen your reputation with reviews on Trustpilot.

Get started

Help millions make the right choice

Help millions make the right choice

Share your experience on Trustpilot, where reviews make a difference.

authenticationBanner/auth_banner_1-1.jpg
authenticationBanner/auth_banner_1-1.jpg
authenticationBanner/auth_banner_2-1.jpg
authenticationBanner/auth_banner_2-1.jpg
authenticationBanner/auth_banner_3-1.jpg
authenticationBanner/auth_banner_3-1.jpg

We’re Trustpilot

We’re Trustpilot

We’re a review platform that’s open to everyone. Our vision is to become the universal symbol of trust — by empowering people to shop with confidence, and helping companies improve.

Our new Trust Report has landed!

Find out which actions we’ve taken to protect you and promote trust on our platform.

Take a look
Trust Report image

Recent reviews

Sf Mason

Sf Mason

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

After my experience, I would highly recommend looking at alternative options, if you want a smoother experience in making a claim for any leaks or damage to your property. I had to raise 2 complaints and take this to the Financial Services Ombudsmen (FSO) which likely going nowhere. I had a singular intermittent bathroom leak back in Nov 2025, which was difficult to trace due to not being a consistent one. 2 plumbers were called, both of them were unable to trace the source, at which point discussions with Halifax broke down as they initially refused to help with anything to trace the leak, which included minimal contact, 2 different claims people and my claim being 'lost' in their system for 2 weeks. Coupled to a phone system that was automated and contentiously gets details wrong compounding the issue, so good luck trying to phone them. No direct email was offered for the best part of a month until finally getting a hold of a point of contact via email. Complaint no 1 was raised, and after laying out £714 for a leak detection company, the leak was traced to the toilet overflow pipe not being correctly connected. This was repaired and resolved at my own cost, per insurance agreement. Eventually the complaint was upheld , and the £714 was refunded plus £400 for the delay and a change in procedure when dealing with a hard to find leak. Halifax will help now with leak detection if you have more than 1 plumber out to find a leak without success. Only after this month of messing around did Halifax send out an assessor to inspect and recommend required repairs to the house. The results of this would require the bathroom floor to be stripped, some work around the drywalls as this had been affected, and the ceiling replacement depending on asbestos testing. 3 tests later due to samples being lost in the post given at this point it was Christmas 2025, it was found that the ceiling had to be completely removed due to asbestos. This took a month to resolve, but was then sorted out pretty quickly. Upon the old ceiling was removed, the pipes from the toilet and bath to the down pipe were found in poor condition and was not in a fit enough state for restoration to service, of which pictures were taken and emailed to the contractors for them to access if the pipework needed repairs / replacement to ensure the rest of the work was not at risk. A few days later the contractors agreed that the pipework had to be repaired given they had to remove the toilet and sink to facilitate floor repairs which was part of the claim after which they raised a project scope update to Halifax per normal procedure. A few days after the email to the contractors, they came back and told me that Halifax refused to cover the repairs sighting "We do not cover bad workmanship" despite the fact their own contractors had assessed the issue and deemed it necessary work to ensure the surrounding works were not put at further risk. At this point , this was March 2026, so I requested that the contractors quote me for the repair work to redo the pipework and not further delay the repairs. The cost was another £600 of plumbing repairs at my cost and paid to the contractors to get the plumbing resolved with all invoices with pictures taken. Added to this, I was requested to vacate the house during the works as there was no other facilities on site so I moved in with family for the projected 2 weeks needed for the work to be carried out, rather than into a hotel as a favour to save Halifax further costs of £1200 for that time. Cue Complaint no 2 back to Halifax, with the pictures, emails, cost estimates for accommodation that were not required with supporting evidence, to which I was given the same lame excuse of "We do not cover bad workmanship" despite their own contractors contradicting them and myself presenting all the emails, invoices and picture of the affected plumbing. Upon this , I requested that to be confirmed in writing and took it up with the Financial Service Ombudsmen following some advice from a friend whom works in insurance. Do not be afraid to raise a complaint as every complaint with a financial service automatically gets registered with the FSO and has to be addressed. The house is at least back in order, and I am currently awaiting results from the FSO on what the decision is on the matter of the £600, but at the time of writing , this seems unlikely.

Parminder Singh

Parminder Singh

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

My membership was terminated in an email randomly with immediate effect over allegations relating to a Google review criticising the lack of enforcement of gym etiquette. I was not given any opportunity to respond to these allegations before the decision was made. More seriously, the termination email states: “We have written to you before about repeated breaches of our membership rules.” This is factually incorrect in my experience. I did not receive any previous written warnings or communications from The Gym Group regarding these alleged breaches. I have therefore asked them to provide copies of the alleged warnings and the dates on which they were supposedly sent. I have also asked them to provide the evidence showing that I personally took and uploaded the photographs they refer to, rather than simply making an assumption based on material found online. What concerns me most is that The Gym Group expects members to follow its Membership Agreement and rules, while I feel that the same standards of accuracy, fairness and contractual process have not been applied to the way my membership was terminated. I have requested that they identify the specific contractual provision they believe I breached, provide the evidence relied upon, and explain the basis for immediate termination. I am not opposed to reasonable gym rules, and I understand the importance of respecting other members' privacy. My concern is how this particular decision was reached and the inaccurate statement that I had previously been contacted about repeated breaches when I had not received such communication. And reaching out to the customer service take hours and is of no use as the general response is to reach out to the branch where they are not available. It has caused me a lot of hassle. Even I don't wish to continue at a gym with such huge double standards but this whimsical sudden termination in the middle of billing cycle means that won't refund the money that I had paid for this month which is quite unfair and I'm going to reach out to the consumer right committee as there's a clear breach of membership agreement on their end!