RUN AWAY
⭐ 1/5 — Legal & General income protection: protection you may discover is worthless when you actually need it
My experience with Legal & General has destroyed my confidence in its income-protection products.
When I became seriously ill and needed the cover I had relied upon, L&G ultimately terminated my claim. I submitted evidence, followed the required processes and raised detailed questions about the basis of its decision. Yet L&G has now declared the matter “closed” and expressly stated that it will not respond further—even though I remain firmly of the view that important points have not been properly answered.
I am not concealing the fact that the Financial Ombudsman Service did not uphold my complaint. However, that does not change my personal experience of L&G’s conduct or make its handling of the matter feel fair, transparent or acceptable. An Ombudsman outcome should not prevent customers from describing honestly how an insurer treated them.
I have a professional background in audit, legal and regulatory compliance. I understand the importance of evidence, policies, procedures and accurate disclosure. I approached this claim carefully and methodically. What shocked me was how exposed a customer can become when an insurer decides to challenge or terminate a claim—and how difficult it can be to obtain complete, direct answers once the insurer has settled upon its position.
Income protection is purchased for the moment when illness has already left someone physically, emotionally and financially vulnerable. That is precisely when an insurer’s integrity, transparency and willingness to engage matter most. In my case, I felt I encountered defensiveness, finality and refusal to engage meaningfully—not the protection and reassurance I believed I had purchased.
My warning to potential customers is simple: do not judge this type of policy by its marketing, its monthly premium or the reputation of the brand. Examine the exclusions, disclosure requirements, medical-wording provisions and termination clauses in forensic detail. Ask yourself what resources you would have to challenge the insurer if it stopped paying when you were seriously unwell.
My warning to existing policyholders is even more urgent: retain every application, adviser communication, medical record, telephone recording, policy document and piece of correspondence. Check now that L&G’s records accurately reflect everything disclosed when the policy was taken out. Do not assume that paying premiums means the insurer will interpret matters in your favour when a substantial claim arises.
Based on my experience, I could never recommend Legal & General income protection to a friend, colleague or family member. The real test of an insurer is not how professionally it sells a policy—it is how it behaves when the customer becomes ill and the insurer is required to honour the protection that customer believed they had bought.
For me, when that test came, L&G failed completely. I paid for peace of mind and was left fighting the very company that was supposed to protect me.








