Love the Wayback Machine. It's pretty good, it doesn't save XML documents well which is something they could improve upon. They're all far too quick to remove sites from the Wayback Machine. This... See more
While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more
To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more
See what reviewers are saying
I love this website! Started reading books from 600 years ago and wow so much wisdom and knowledge that has been lost in time is mind blowing etc... This has become my new hobby and favorite website.... See more
I thought this would be the perfect site for all those movies I can't find anywhere else. However the search engine is useless, less than useless actually. I lucked out and found the original Shogun... See more
the internet archive is one of the most fun pages you could ever just browse around on, you can see so much. There is only ONE flaw, website owners are allowed to remove themselves. Sure there are pro... See more
Company details
Information provided by various external sources
" It provides free public access to collections of digitized materials, including websites, software applications/games, music, movies/videos, moving images, and millions of public-domain books.
Contact info
Clement Street 1115, 94118, San Francisco, United States
- archive.org
No history of asking for reviews
This company hasn't invited their customers, so reviews may not be representative
How this company uses Trustpilot
See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.
always works great for me
always works great for me! no ads or virus
A Great Idea That No Longer Works the Way It Should
Internet Archive is a valuable project, and I genuinely respect the original idea behind making archived web content freely accessible to everyone. But at some point, good intentions are no longer enough.
For over a month, I've been experiencing HTTP 429 errors after manually opening as few as eight archived records. No scraping, no automation, no bots. Just normal, light personal use.
I've reported this issue repeatedly. My emails have been ignored, and on several occasions I've been told the problem was fixed when it clearly wasn't. A month later, absolutely nothing has changed.
I understand that AI bots and large-scale scraping are putting enormous pressure on services like the Internet Archive. But why are ordinary users being punished for it? Why should someone manually browsing a handful of archived pages face the same restrictions intended to stop automated scraping?
And perhaps more importantly, why is Internet Archive still trying to maintain a model that increasingly seems unable to distinguish legitimate users from abusive traffic?
I've even suggested introducing a reasonable paid subscription for users who want reliable access. I'd gladly pay for a service that actually works. Free access could remain available, but there needs to be a better solution than simply restricting everyone and leaving legitimate users dealing with constant errors.
I appreciate the philosophy of keeping knowledge freely accessible. But that philosophy loses much of its meaning when the service becomes unreliable and the people reporting problems are ignored.
The internet has changed. AI has changed how websites are accessed and scraped. Perhaps it's time Internet Archive reconsidered how it operates instead of continuing to rely on an approach that clearly isn't working for everyone.
What disappoints me most isn't even the technical problem. It's the lack of accountability, the poor communication, and the apparent unwillingness to acknowledge that something is fundamentally wrong.
A valuable mission doesn't excuse poor execution or disrespectful treatment of users.
STOP BEGGING PEOPLE FOR DONATIONS AND START FIXING YOUR BROKEN SERVICE!
It's absolutely PATHETIC to constantly ask for money while ignoring users, leaving basic issues unresolved for months, and pretending everything works. FREE DOESN'T EXCUSE INCOMPETENCE.
What a disgrace!
This site is removing information…
This site is removing information continuously most of the content I mean video content has no sound. Videos that we’re available a year ago are missing from the site now.
It also spreads a lot of disinformation as most of the videos are completely false and I verified and tested these just to check if what they were saying was realistic, and it’s the furthest thing from the truth. Now they do say that they can’t police it all and when they do find something misleading, they remove it but there’s a ton of information that misleading. I have to wonder who is funding this archive site although it’s listed as a nonprofit they seem to get funding elsewhere I’ve donated money to them, but I’m reluctant to donate anymore because the site does not work properly. They have numerous problems.
The website made to help stop lost media helps it
The website made to help stop lost media helps it by taking down stuff all the time for copyright yet allows porn and other bad stuff stay all the time. And as a bonus it is ether down or so buggy it's unusable.
Ignorant pointless service.
Ignorant, lazy , and absolutely pointless.if I Could score minus 5 I would.
The Internet Archive supports…
The Internet Archive supports pedophiles that upload CSAM.
I have reported several times the same user that uploads PDF files from European Countries featuring underage girls in magazines. IA refused to take the content down.
They simply made it Log-In only to view?
Sick.
The User also added his own Candid Photos he took of girls on nude beaches from a distance that he claims are "over 18".
How can he guarantee this?
A better question is why should Archive stay online after this?
Children can access this content and the user should be blocked and reported.
IA is disgusting for allowing this content and should be doing all they can to eradicate it from their site, but they obviously do not care and let it remain.
Pathetic, VILE, and Sad that IA would risk their entire website while begging their users for donations for one User.
I got an 502 error when I tried to get…
I got an 502 error when I tried to get into that section where I was able to read old books
I love using the internet archive to…
I love using the internet archive to look at magazine scans and read books online, but it's annoying when their website is down
Terrible service that doesn't even work…
Terrible service that doesn't even work most days. There are server errors and outages left and right. It is totally unusable. No longer a viable reading option.
What is required to be able to archive…
What is required to be able to archive more links to the Wayback Machine?
I sent to the company but you can't archive more websites per day because it overloads the servers, and today I could only archive 4 today and then get a message: You have reached your daily bandwidth limit. Please email us at "info @ archive.org" if you would like to discuss this more."
But there's no point in sending to them then and discussing this and knowing that I could archive more before per day.
You don't have time to save that much of a page before the page is shut down.
The year is 2026 but the website is still overloaded and it's unsustainable that you can't archive more than 4 URLs per day.
Straight down hill to Hell in a Handbasket
I had not visited this site in a few months. It now seems to be a right wing propaganda spewing machine. Seriously, in a drop down menu, one option is "Donald tru#Sp's Tweets".
Movies I previously found easily no longer exist on the site.
The fact that this has not 5 stars…
The fact that this has not 5 stars tells you how useless trustpilot is.
When contacting staff regarding a…
When contacting staff regarding a problem they appear to deliberately misunderstand a query or simply don't understand it. this is despite explaining it several times. The website itself is great, but don't waste your time trying to get any semblance of understanding or help from their staff.
I don't know much about this so I'm not…
I don't know much about this so I'm not too sure if I trust it
The Internet Archive is an amazing digital resource
I'm disappointed by the amount of negative reviews for one of the most important websites on the internet. The Internet Archive is an excellent resource for documentation purposes.
People seem to be complaining about their lack of being able to access lost content/media that they cannot watch, while failing to realize that the reason they are unable to watch/access such content is because the wayback machine does not host the content. The internet archive is really just a massive collection of static pages.
Also, the Internet archive makes it easy for webmasters to remove their websites from their search engine. That's a MAJOR plus!
Great resource!
AMAZING
i use this website mainly for old discontinued programs or for operating systems like windows xp or 98 SE isos so i can run the systems in a vm
It's a very cool we resource
It's a very cool we resource.
There's a lot of free material, I am in love woth this website. Thanks to the developers 😍 for this beautiful sharing space.
Amazing
Almost anything from the past can be found here. It's amazing and doesn't get enough credit.
The Trustpilot Experience
Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.
We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.
Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.
Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.
Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.
Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.








