Reuters Reviews 65

The doxxed Banksy. Scum bags

Extremely biased. Just another example of everything that is wrong with modern media.

Completely tasteless behavior.
Is this a site for journalism or just a low acting gossip site !?!

Exposing Banksy is You pinnacle of stupidity and poor taste.

Not what I hoped for, they are turning into a gossipmedia

Shame on this company for revealing Banksy's identity. It's a profound human right breach, for the sake of a stupid article

Definitely one of the most biased news broadcasts that I have seen in a while and that is saying a lot.

Reuters "Fact Check" team is the most deranged and unbelievable form of journalism this planet has ever seen. Anything Reuters says. Is the opposite.

Highly reliable unbiased oufit. The problem is they want people to subscribe at a fee to be able to read their broadcasted news…!
Ridiculous…!

I’ve been following reuters for years, and it’s one of the most reliable sources when it comes to getting quick news. They always publish facts, not trash info. Sometimes navigation around the website may lag, but overall it’s good for reading useful articles in daily routinte. I feel how I get older and looking like a granfather. xD

Horrible reporting. They couldn't find the truth if it slapped them in the face. I recently read on article so full of lies about someone I hope they are slapped with a defamation suit. Blocked their sorry reporting from my feed.

When you go to the Asian section of Reuters Markets on main Reuters Web Page news it only seems to show Indian news though China is much bigger and second largest economy after USA where as india is smaller. Think Indians are now controlling Reuters as all offshored to India. Makes sense. I no longer read reuters. Prefer CNBC.

Very poor journalism. Do not trust.

Reuters (alongside the FT and BBC) is where I get my news from. The reporting is in-depth and fact checked and its coverage of global affairs is excellent. It employs its own reporters and journalists. It is regularly updated. For those reasons, I tend to give Reuters stories high credence. For me, the subscription is absolutely worth it.

I watched Donald Trump show a video to the South African president of himself chanting death to white farmers, and the next day Reuter’s says it’s fake news…. When it’s quite clear. Why is Reuter’s spreading fake news. This platform has become so biased, and spreading false news!

Associated Press is extremely US focused, and is highly biased towards parochial
American liberal coastal viewpoint on news stories and on choice of which on subjects to cover. The standard of writing is also often quite poor, inaccurate and lacking in alternative viewpoints.
Reuters on the other hand, is excellent in all of the above.
A sterling example of what a wire agency should be,
an amazing respource for other journalists, the general public and policymakers alike.
Coverage is far more indepth and they are global leaders in breaking news stories across the globe, unlike the AP which tends to regurgitate news stories nowadays

DOGE has exposed them for taking the federal dollar.

Seriously? Every. Single. Article. You DEMAND I pay you? For what? The same information I could get anywhere else?

Greedy selfish people posing as "journalists."

I don't care about ANYTHING YOU WRITE ABOUT ANYMORE BECAUSE I AM TOO IRRITATED BY YOUR TERRIBLE WEBSITE

I used to go to Reuters for most of my news, especially as introductory to current events. Now everything's behind a paywall. Sure, 1 dollar a week doesn't seem like much, but when you're living paycheck to paycheck, those 4 dollars can be the difference of having a dinner for a night.