12rsc Reviews 

12 RSC, are very reliable, they are the right kind of people you want behind you. Really good investment and they will make sure to give you good service, I put all my trust in them 100%

12 RSC is where the stakes are steep, but so is the climb to triumph,

12RSC are the people you want in your corner when it really matters. Excellent service, professional from start to finish, and the results speak for themselves. Definitely worth the investment.

12RSC, the place you go when winning your case matters. Not the cheapest but worth every penny. Professional, knowledgeable, and they deliver when it counts

12 RSC — where the price is high, but so are the chances of victory✊🏾

12 RSC, the place you go to win your case🤝. Not cheap, but worth every penny.‼️💰

Was very happy with advice and information I received when speaking to 12rsc. it lifted a great weight off my brain and filled me with a lot confidence going forward with my legal matter.

Thank you Angela Sharma and 12RSC for assisting me with setting up a Trust for my son.

I was unsure how to proceed and set up my son for a bright future, I was so happy when I met her and some of my questions was finally answered and I let her lead the way. Very happy to use her service and and will use her again.

I experienced a court filing issue caused by another legal service, and the team at 12RSC helped get everything resolved efficiently. Their support saved me a considerable amount of time and stress, which I'm extremely grateful for.

I'd like to extend a thank you to both Dave & Jerome.

Thank you Mr Wilcox and Mr Foreman for helping me receive a favourable judgement against that scoundrel marketing company last month.
I thought it important to leave a review, as you were very helpful in a particularly difficult matter.
When that marketing company promised to promote my start up, and then didn’t deliver on their promises, 12RSC helped me take them to court.
From the beginning Mr Foreman was helpful and knowledgeable. Letting me know what was possible under the law. And then Mr Wilcox took the case to court where I got a favourable judgement.

Thanks again

Charles

My wife and I have an ongoing property-related legal matter, and the support we have received has been exceptional from beginning to end.

We were initially introduced to the chambers through their clerk, David Foreman, whose knowledge has been outstanding. He has kept us fully informed throughout the process, and his professionalism and communication have been first class.

Our barrister, Dr Sandy Joseph-Urquhart, has been equally outstanding. From the outset, she explained the legal strategy clearly and ensured we understood every stage of the proceedings. She is exceptionally well prepared, highly professional, and an excellent advocate in court. Her advice has always been clear, focused, and reassuring.

We genuinely could not have reached this stage without Dr Sandy's expert guidance and support. I would have no hesitation in recommending Dr Sandy Joseph-Urquhart to anyone seeking a highly skilled, professional, and dedicated barrister. We are extremely grateful for the service we have received.

Avoid at all costs literally! Spoke to a lovely clerk, was told that Jerome Wilcox had reviewed my case and that I should pay a mandate of over £4K, which was meant to include writing letters, read bundle, prepare documents and arguments for a small civil hearing etc. I received a one hour call with this Jerome Wilcox, in that call he gave no relevant guidance, he kept saying that if I wanted a reply that would be another mandate (so another 4k) - I got better advice from Chat GPT than this scoundrel and he started the 1 hour call by not wanting to turn his camera on. He then Stated what I had paid him for didn't need to be done then refused to give a refund then tried to blame everything on his clerk! Has been reported to the bar of barristers. Make sure you record every call and meeting with audio and video. This behaviour seems very well practised.

Following a highly complex commercial property dispute that began in 2020, our case became increasingly challenging during its final stages. After receiving conflicting and predominantly negative opinions from several previous solicitors, we were fortunate to instruct Mr. J. Wilcox.
Mr. Wilcox demonstrated exceptional patience and meticulously analyzed our case with a fine-tooth comb. His legal strategies were precise, prompt, and delivered with absolute honesty. Thanks to his expert guidance and dedicated assistance, this long-standing court case has now been successfully resolved. I highly recommend Mr. Wilcox to anyone seeking a thoroughly professional, highly skilled, and trustworthy legal advocate.

Barrister Angela Sharma, provided exceptional legal representation in my brother's case. She demonstrated a strong command of the relevant law, meticulous attention to detail, and thorough case preparation throughout the proceedings. Her strategic approach, clear legal analysis, and proactive handling of complex issues were instrumental in progressing the matter effectively.
Angela went above and beyond in her commitment to the case, ensuring all aspects were carefully considered and expertly presented. Her professionalism, diligence, and advocacy were greatly appreciated, and I would highly recommend her services.

I would like to publish a warning about the barrister from this chamber. After publishing the review here Ms Angela Sharma wrote to me an email at 10.17 that she will make a deflamation claim against me if i don remove it. I politely replied at10.57 pm and she replied at 11.24 at night that she just reported me to the police for harrasment because I replied to her own email that she herself send me at night. She is proffesional Barrister. see this correspondence below: On 17 Jun 2026 22:17, xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Dear Ms Farrow,

RE: DEFAMATORY PUBLICATION ON TRUSTPILOT

I write regarding the review published by you on Trustpilot concerning me and the professional services I provided.

The review contains a number of statements which are false, defamatory and seriously damaging to my professional reputation as a practising barrister.

In particular, I refer to the following statements:

"It was worst experience possible."
"No proper representation provided after receiving money in front."
"During the hearing my barrister Angela Sharma was attending by video. She didn't participate and allowed the prosecution to take over a case." Yes, you failed to explain the failures of your compliance with orders.
"She is young inexperienced and scared of the opposite party."

These statements are wholly untrue.

As you are aware, substantial work was undertaken on your behalf, including review of the extensive electronic portal created by you, review of the documentary evidence, conference with you, preparation for the hearing, consideration of disclosure issues, review of the Respondent's bundle, preparation of examination and cross-examination material, and representation at Brighton Magistrates' Court on 16 June 2026.

Your assertion that no proper representation was provided is therefore false.

Likewise, your allegation that I "didn't participate" in the hearing is false. I attended the hearing, represented you, made submissions on your behalf and advanced your position before the Court.

Your statement that I am "inexperienced" is also false and damaging. I am a practising barrister with conduct of numerous cases across multiple jurisdictions. Similarly, the allegation that I was "scared of the opposite party" is entirely without foundation and is a serious attack upon my professional competence and integrity.

Whilst you are entitled to express an honestly held opinion, you are not entitled to publish false factual allegations that are likely to cause serious harm to my professional reputation.

Accordingly, I require that you:
1. Remove the review in its entirety within 24 hours of this email – if this is not, I will issue a formal notice.
2. Confirm in writing that the review has been removed;
3. Refrain from publishing further false or defamatory allegations concerning me.

Should you fail to comply, I reserve all rights, including the right to commence formal legal action and to issue a Letter of Claim pursuant to the Pre-Action Protocol for Media and Communications Claims. I will also rely upon this correspondence on the issue of costs.

Nothing in this letter should be taken as a waiver of any rights or remedies available to me, all of which are expressly reserved.

Yours faithfully,
Angela Sharma
Barrister

Angela Sharma
Barrister & Mediator
Authorised by the Bar Standards Board to Conduct Litigation
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board

10-12 Regent Street
London
SW1Y 4PE
DDI: 020 4534 7396

It was worst experience possible. No proper representation provided after receiving money in front. During the hearing my barrister Angela Sharma was attending by video. She didn't participate and allow the prosecution to take over a case. She is young inexperienced and scared of the opposite party.

Having dealt with this chambers on multiple issues, I couldn’t recommend them enough.
The first count is with their clerk,David, whose knowledge is first hand and exceeds any other I have come across.
I have been lucky enough to have been guided and represented by Dwain, Angela and Rodrick. Throughout each experience I felt I was listened to, advised well, contact was always maintained and each section of the proceedings explained in great detail creating a sense of reassurance and understanding. All with amazing outcomes and remedies

My experience with this chambers was deeply disappointing. This firm took me as a client on 20/01/25—one day after I was discharged from the hospital following a mental health crisis related to the stress of this case. Following my discharge and while dealing with this firm to prepare for my first hearing on 30 January 2025, I was under the care of the ELFT CMHT. Despite providing evidence of this medical emergency and sending emails and evidence detailing the severe mental toll I was under, I feel the instructed barrister lacked any empathy during my communications with her, or when I disclosed the mental effect the case was having on me.

Furthermore, during two video calls prior to that first hearing—which felt rushed and automatically disconnected after exactly one hour—the instructed barrister displayed what I perceived to be clear annoyance while dealing with me. I personally felt that the instructed barrister appeared impatient and judgmental regarding the allegations against me during our 1st call. I feel I was treated slightly better when my mum attended my 2nd video call, as there was a witness. This experience eroded my trust because it felt like they were not on my side, which significantly damaged my confidence.

A defence statement was subsequently prepared and submitted within my budget on 12 Feb 2025. Basic administrative care was lacking during this time, including my name being misspelled in emails from the instructed barrister, even after I had explicitly corrected her and the clerk consistantly spelling it correctly in emails we were both CC'd in . Following the submission of that statement, the specific instruction concluded as agreed. However, despite the instructed barrister holding my case history and being aware of my medical situation, there was no proactive client care from the them for the next 15 months as my trial date approached.

Out of desperation, I reached out to the chambers again on 11/05/26—1 week before my trial—specifically because they already had my case background. Instead of assistance, I was informed that they required a substantial upfront fee to represent me and advised to consider them submiting an adjournment at a lower cost, which i still couldnt afford, if i hired a separate paralegal as requested.
I was told I would need to hire a separate paralegal or use a firm they were familiar with at an additional cost, which I made clear I could not afford. This was to prepare my defence bundle from evidence i previously submitted to help my defence statement, I was given 48 hours to do so, adding more pressure and stress onto me. I even offered to prepare the bundle myself as I could not afford this, and this was denied as the instructed barrister lacked confidence that I would produce a "correctly formatted bundle."

This combination of financial requests and rejections made it feel as though they did not want to assist me with my trial. I was also advised to seek alternative representation.

I did seek alternative help at the last minute, Despite having no prior knowledge of my case, they took me on out of genuine empathy for my immense distress. The only positive development at this stage was that the previous chambers removed their names from my case portal in a timely manner—following a formal Client Authority Letter I signed through my new firm—allowing my new representation unobstructed access to step in and help me.

My new firm worked tirelessly to get me fully trial-ready in just 4 days. They maintained regular contact, dedicated over two and a half hours on the phone to understand my side and go through my case, showed genuine empathy for a vulnerable client, chased down the police and CPS for the requested evidence on my DSC, offered reassurance, reviewed and encouraged all of the evidence I sent them that i felt was relevent to my case. They did this no matter how extensive or what format I sent it in, and they got a bundle ready for me—all at a significantly lower cost.

Ultimately, because the CPS/police had failed to respond to the defence statement originally filed or to my new representation's requests, and because my new barrister had successfully prepared my case in just 96hours, the CPS's request to adjourn the trial was denied by the court. This resulted in my immediate acquittal and a DCO being granted.

While the legal outcome was successful, the service and support received from this chamber during a critical and stressful time, significantly increased my distress.

Disclaimer: This review represents my honest opinion and a factual chronology of my genuine consumer experience with this legal service provider. All details are based on documented interactions.

We recently concluded a long-running and complex legal matter, which involved multiple court appearances and significant challenges along the way. This was our second time taking the case to court, and the process was far from straightforward.

We are pleased to say that we were successful in the case and were awarded our costs, which was a significant and well-earned outcome!

Jeremy Wilcox, our barrister, was exceptional throughout. His commitment, preparation, and determination were evident at every stage. During one of the hearings, he spoke for over an hour, presenting our case with clarity and conviction. His advocacy was instrumental, and we are confident the outcome would not have been the same without him.

We are extremely grateful for his support and perseverance in what has been a demanding and lengthy process.

David, the clerk, was also excellent at maintaining communication throughout the case. He kept us informed at every step and ensured everything ran smoothly behind the scenes.

We would highly recommend Jeremy Wilcox to anyone facing a significant or complex legal dispute.