Not a good Ecommerce teacher
Not a good Ecommerce teacher
佢會同你講一套理論，但實際上根本行唔通。佢教你用空運去測產品、快啲攞數據，但其實完全唔work。因為你啲競爭對手全部都係用海運，如果你用空運，成本高之餘風險仲大好多，而且通常只適合0.5kg以下嘅產品。
即係話，你為咗跟佢呢個建議，反而要放棄一啲本身用海運都可以測試、而且有潛力嘅產品。
呢個老師仲教你用空運寄FBA貨，而唔係用海運，即係你要畀多3至4倍運費。但同時，佢又叫你將貨擺喺Amazon倉庫等成個月，直到有5至10個Vine review先開始開廣告。咁樣嘅話，其實完全自相矛盾——既然都要等咁耐，點解仲要用空運？
再加上你仲未計Amazon referral fee、入倉費、FBA費、PPC廣告成本，用空運點樣可以有利潤？
講到Amazon Vine，Amazon本身可能要幾日先送到貨畀評論員，而呢啲Vine reviewer唔係只收你一間嘅產品，佢哋同時會收好多賣家嘅免費產品。就算佢哋收到你嘅產品，都可以幾時寫review都得，冇任何時間限制。
就好似你去餐廳免費食飯換取寫review，但餐廳通常都唔會限定你幾時一定要寫。
另外，如果你喺未有5–10個Vine評價之前完全唔做任何廣告支出，即係話你成個月都冇打廣告。喺Amazon演算法角度嚟睇，就等於你根本唔想賣產品，因為你冇做推廣；喺 Amazon 眼中，你嘅產品同你呢個賣家都只係 idle account, inactive seller. 呢樣其實會好傷你個帳戶。
呢個老師會教你一套聽落幾好但實際上行唔通嘅理論：用空運去攞快數據，然後等到有5–10個評價先開始打廣告，想藉此降低廣告成本。我好懷疑佢自己做生意係咪真係用呢套策略，因為根本唔work，講白啲就係吹水。
學生應該得到準確、有根據嘅建議，而唔係隨便講嘅意見。
呢位老師話自己有一百萬營業額，咁實際利潤有幾多呢？佢又有冇同你講過，喺幫學生或者客戶嘅過程中，有冇出現過虧損嘅情況？
老實講，我好懷疑呢個老師而家仲係咪一個成功嘅賣家。佢更似係幫客戶打理產品，或者純粹教電商。換句話講，就算學生或者客戶蝕錢，都唔會影響到佢自己。
我想講，其實呢個老師嘅建議一直都好矛盾。最初佢叫人同時測試10至15個產品，聽落好吸引，但佢有冇計過，如果用空運，每款30件，10至15款產品嘅運費會幾誇張？呢種做法根本係極之昂貴，而且完全唔實際。佢完全冇由實際營運角度去諗過可唔可行。
但當時我比較天真，就真係照佢講去做，幫15+個產品做專利搜尋。每個產品大概要HKD $400，15個已經差唔多HKD $6000。之後佢又推翻自己，話唔好同時做咁多產品，應該集中做一款，先可以學完整個流程。我可以提供對話截圖，證明佢前後講法一直都自相矛盾。
另外，佢提倡用空運，其實都好唔現實，基本上只係適合啲好心急嘅人。運費貴3至4倍，其實就等於你即刻將自己嘅風險放大3至4倍，又貴又唔實際。
明明你仲有其他成本要承擔，例如產品攝影、優化listing嘅時間同精力，點解要無端端將風險放大到咁？我真係會懷疑，佢到底知唔知道自己教緊啲乜。
我都有問過佢，如果我只訂30件，但又要送30件俾Vine reviewer，咁咪即刻冇晒庫存？所以我覺得應該訂100件會合理啲。但佢嘅回覆（我都有截圖）係，就算免費送都未必有人會領，所以30件已經夠。
但之後佢又叫我等到有5至10個Vine review先開始做廣告。我同佢講，咁樣唔可行，因為可能要等成個月先有review。佢又話，一般如果產品吸引，兩星期內就會有人領。
咁問題就嚟啦——如果真係會咁快被領取，30件根本唔夠；但按佢另一個講法，就算免費都未必有人要。前後邏輯完全對唔上。
一開始我真係覺得佢好專業，但當佢不斷自相矛盾，我開始覺得佢根本唔係一個真正有實戰經驗嘅Amazon賣家。
佢嘅好評我係相信嘅，應該都係真，但大部分都係2022至2024年。我相信佢以前嘅服務質素可能係好，但以我2026年嘅親身經驗，佢嘅教學質素真係幾差。
另外，我都唔覺得佢仲有積極經營生意。我試過打電話去9205 6027，從來冇人聽。
我寫呢個評論，係因為我唔知道有幾多人會聽佢呢套策略（空運產品 + 等到有5–10個Vine review先開始開Amazon PPC廣告）。老實建議，呢類教法風險好高，最好小心，甚至直接遠離呢個電商老師。
Reply from alxwu.com
Thank you for your comment. However, I must address several important points regarding both the content and the basis of this review.
You have not purchased or enrolled in this course. Our records show no paid enrolment associated with your account. Your exposure to this content is limited to freely available YouTube videos, which represent only a partial and introductory overview of the methodology — not the full course curriculum. A review of a course you have never taken is not a genuine consumer experience, and Trustpilot's own guidelines require reviews to be based on a real interaction with the business being reviewed.
Regarding the claims about air freight: The recommendation to use air freight applies specifically to the initial test shipment — typically a small batch of 30 units or fewer. The purpose is to shorten the feedback loop at the earliest and most uncertain stage of a product launch, allowing sellers to assess ad performance, coupon redemption rates, and early review quality before committing to a larger inventory. This is a deliberate risk management strategy, not a contradiction. The full rationale, including when sea freight becomes appropriate, is covered in detail within the paid course — content you have not accessed.
Regarding your assertion that I made specific public statements: I would ask you to provide verifiable evidence — a recording, a timestamped transcript, or a direct reference — to support this claim. Asserting that someone said something without being able to substantiate it does not constitute a fair or credible review.
I welcome genuine feedback from enrolled students. However, a review based on free content, containing unsubstantiated claims, and lacking any specific context about your own product, costs, or situation, does not meet the standard of a fair and honest review.