Casino ivibet confiscated whole my winnings so I wrote an official complaint to this site with many proves/screens and they rejected it without a reason. Completely not helpful. After your reply -... See more
Company replied
While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more
To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more
Casino ivibet confiscated whole my winnings so I wrote an official complaint to this site with many proves/screens and they rejected it without a reason. Completely not helpful. After your reply -... See more
Company replied
Quite simply put, if it wasn’t for AskGamblers.com I would have had Zero recourse & Absolutely no means of contacting let alone holding the casino in question accountable for My specific problem & or... See more
Company replied
I’ve been browsing Casinorealm.online for a few days now, and I'm quite impressed by how clearly they explain the different casino games and their mechanics. The layout is clean, and it's easy to find... See more
Company replied
They got the attention of the casino that was not sending out my money right away. Very good experience cusse the casinos actually follow the platform and need to look good so they resolve your issue... See more
Company replied
AskGamblers provides players with a unique complaints system that helps them resolve any issues they may have with an online casino and get their money back. The site uses an advanced casino ranking algorithm to rate casinos and provide players with accurate information.
I have had to use askgamblers.codm three seperate times when dealing with an online casino delaying my withdrawal request, all 3 times, the casino was contacted by askgamblers.com and i was paid within 7 days. i attempted to deal with the online casino by myself for more than 4 weeks but still no payment. askgamblers.com had me paid within 7 days each and every time Can't thank them enough.

Reply from AskGamblers
On my experience askgamblers is on the bettors side. By far the fastest to make casinos and sportsbooks respond to your queries. They approved my complaint against Oscarspin in a very short time. In the past they resolved a problem I had with Legiano casino.

Reply from AskGamblers
Very good platform for resolving issues of customers in gambling sites.

Reply from AskGamblers
As always they really helped me achieve the outcome I was looking for.
Can't say enough good about them.
Thanks again to them

Reply from AskGamblers
Usually i will use dafabet casino for games and all there I have multiple issues with withdrawal or deposit and I will try to connect with customer service but I am very unhappy with it so when I raise a complaint in Askgamblers the issue will be resolved in 1-4 days which is great

Reply from AskGamblers
My experience with Askgamber was a top notch…

Reply from AskGamblers
for some reason the site never accepts files i attach but i send them to the support email and they attach it ask gamblers has helped me with a few issues now and is top notch in their profession

Reply from AskGamblers
The platform is very supportive and the issue get resolved within time frame for which I was wandering for 30 days. I am happy that they resolve it within 2 days

Reply from AskGamblers
Great support as always :) The only ones I trust when it comes to a complaint with gambling operators.

Reply from AskGamblers
AskGamblers presents itself as an independent dispute resolution platform. In reality, it functions as little more than a message board where casinos repeat themselves until the platform shrugs and closes the case.
I submitted a complaint towards Goldex Casino backed by video evidence showing a live bonus mechanic (a POWER symbol) visibly active during a game round and then never resolved. In this game, POWER symbols are not cosmetic. They always resolve to a value or effect. The casino’s explanation was that it was “just a visual glitch” and that the server logs override what the player sees.
Rather than analyze whether a game is allowed to present active mechanics that later “don’t exist,” AskGamblers simply deferred to the operator’s Terms and Conditions and the provider’s self-serving statement that “no technical issue occurred.”
No adjudication took place. No independent reasoning. No examination of whether the game’s behavior was misleading or incompatible with its own rules. The platform did not evaluate the evidence; it merely relayed the casino’s position and closed the case.
AskGamblers does not resolve disputes. It exhausts players until they give up.
If you are looking for advocacy, accountability, or a platform that actually weighs evidence and logic, this is not it. AskGamblers is designed to protect operators, not players.

Reply from AskGamblers
I've crossed paths with 5 different arbitration services in my life. This gives me more of a point of reference than most. My experience with Ask Gamblers (AG) made me neither happy nor angry. I just found it to be a waste of time.
Of 106,833 complaints received, only 34,838 complaints were "processed". Having tried them a couple of times now, I am getting a sense of what this means. I've seen them over and over again look for quick outs to close my complaints without taking a position or really doing any work. Their reasons for doing have generally been framed in a tone deaf, uninvested, and bureaucratic manner with wording that circumvents the point, but which dresses itself in a sort of dispassionate professionalism. To me, it looks like window dressing - copy and paste filler of interchangeable language.
There also seems to be a prioritization of protocol over substance. Did you think they were going to email you when they responded? Wrong. You did not respond within 48 hours, so your complaint is now closed. Did you miss where you need to screenshot every essential detail in your initial submission? Never mind the basic facts were not disputed and nobody else requires this. Complaint closed. Is there actual complexity to your complaint? Complaint closed. Redirect your complaint to the appropriate regulatory body. Here to begin with because, as in almost all cases, there's no objective regulatory body with any teeth? Too bad. Was your casino not on their short list of casinos? Too bad. Have an ongoing issue with a casino that was on their list but is not any longer? Too bad. Complaint closed. Unprocessed, i.e. most, complaints do not go on the public record. It forces you to be careful even warning a casino that you will go to a third party. Unprocessed complaints have a habit of becoming spun as rejected or illegitimate by the opposition.
My most recent complaint was simple and had no lapses in presentation. Didn't matter. AG responded:
"After careful consideration of your case, AskGamblers Complaint Team reached to the conclusion that you must forward the dispute in front of the relevant Gambling Authority directly as they are the only competent authority to conduct proper investigation and reach to justified decision whether there was any breach of the regulatory requirements or not."
Does the above response feel like it could be pasted in as an answer to any complaint? I believe this manner of handling complaints is inflating the Trustpilot score. Intervene on easy cases for + feedback, else stay neutral.
AG is a business constrained like any other with the usual unending pressures to optimize profit. Slow turnover and complexity are not profitable. Optics is. AG makes its money portaling people off to casinos. Many of the complaints they handle will be against these same casinos. This creates the potential for conflicts of interest. Moreso, I have seen the hand of AG's parent company in my dealings with Casinomeister, a complaint service under the same corporate umbrella. It was not pretty. See my other review.
Admittedly, AG has been better than some of the other services I've seen who will make verdicts without doing the work to correctly understand the material or who will become punitive if you fail to remain a docile supplicant. AG will just remain neutral. Still, that is a low bar.
Sadly, my extensive personal experience has shown me the online gambling industry is rife with emboldened operators who will constantly probe around to see what they can get away with when there is little downside for doing so. If a casino tries to cheat a person who has enough competence and tenacity to stand their ground and pressure the casino to do the right thing, that type of situation just becomes a resolved complaint - a statistic where the casino comes off as looking reasonable. Systemically, I have not seen the privatized casino complaint industry hold these casinos' noses to the fire for trying such stunts to begin with. AG's business model entangles itself with the public interest. AG only serves that public interest if they respond in scale to operator transgressions via their ratings. Casinos respond to power, not to perspective or a calm voice.
IMHO, I've lost a lot of money over the years to what I consider antipathetic oversight posing as something else, and AG seems to be an embodiment of the problems one should expect when basic consumer recourse is in itself commoditized. Casinomeister, Casino Guru, SBR, AG...I've found them all to be lacking. They do not exist to bring truth to power.
PS: AG's distorted, nondescript, and bureaucratic cut-out template of a response is emblematic of what you should expect. They had an excess of substantiation to work with. I'm inclined to doubt they did a review of anything

Reply from AskGamblers
Thanks to the Askgamblers Complaint team for the help quickly solving a case.
Their help was invaluable! Couldn't be happier!

Reply from AskGamblers
Quick and efficient and helpful when it comes to getting your complaint solved asap.

Reply from AskGamblers
Jackpotter amazing casino! My favorite!
Fast payouts and deposits

Reply from AskGamblers
It was wonderful experience after raising my issue on their platform that was instantly reviewed and posted on their platform. Later my concern was resolved.

Reply from AskGamblers

Reply from AskGamblers
They deleted my negative review and many more, and they only accepeted positive reviews.
Btw, here they flag negative reviews that tell the truth about them but they don't flag 5 star reviews that write about casinos. Haha. You can see just by the cherry picking what "company" they are, and imagine their employees. Just imagine them. Anyway, stay away.
They only accepted my positive reviews so they could promote their affiliate casino links.

Reply from AskGamblers
True luck casino is a good casino, with a lot of different slots, and variety. And has good payouts. I would recommend it!

Reply from AskGamblers
Was able to resolve issues promptly when I was not able to get a reply from the casino
It’s great to have somewhere to go that can assist especially when you were trying to do the right thing as I excused myself from a casino and this was ignored and allowed me to keep depositing I know I am going to loose money sometimes but this would not have happened if they had excluded when requested

Reply from AskGamblers
Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.
Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.
Learn more about other kinds of reviews.
We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.
Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.
Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.
Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.
Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.