Awful experience with Cedarcare
Cedarcare’s response to a damp problem identified following completion of a basement tanking contract was wholly unsatisfactory, with foot-dragging and denial of responsibility. Eventually they needed two further noisy and dusty attempts to rectify their initial failure over a period of two and a half years. Ongoing dispute over consequential costs.
Cedarcare completed damp treatment works in two rooms in our Fulham basement in May 2015 which, including a five-year guarantee, cost around £3600.
Before finalising their work, we pointed out to Cedarcare that they had omitted to restore a power point in the bedroom. In rectifying their error, they installed the power point on the wall rather than in the wall, as was the case for all the other power points in both rooms.
A damp problem emerged around this power socket, but this was not identified until November 2017 since the socket was hidden behind a bedside table. For over a year Cedarcare refused to accept that this was a problem with their work; they claimed that the damp readings around the socket were within expected levels, so we redecorated. The decorators found that their paint would not dry around the socket; in January 2019, Cedarcare finally accepted liability.
In July 2019, Cedarcare completed a further noisy and dusty hacking-back and replastering effort in an attempt to rectify the issue, following which, after allowing due time for drying out, we redecorated. By the end of the year, however, it was clear that this exercise had failed to solve the problem.
So, in February 2020, we suffered a third noisy and dusty hacking-back and replastering exercise - this time we understand Cedarcare used specialist subcontractors. After allowing time for drying out, we redecorated and replaced the ruined carpets.
The costs which we have incurred, including the engagement of a surveyor to help with our negotiations with Cedarcare, have totalled about the same as the whole of the original contract. Cedarcare have refused to pay for any of this, hiding behind the consequential cost clause in their guarantee which we view as unreasonable: one redecoration could be covered but not three.
Throughout this sad exercise, which was finally resolved around the end of the first quarter of 2020, Cedarcare have dragged their feet and attempted to avoid liability whilst we have had a bedroom largely out-of-use for two and a half years, as well as being significantly out of pocket.
We would not recommend Cedarcare, given the poor quality of their work and their appalling after-sales service.
January 25, 2021
Unprompted review