While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

2.9

Average

TrustScore 3 out of 5

2 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Imlive is the worst videochat platform…

Imlive is the worst videochat platform I have ever worked with. 15+ Years of Experience Speaking

After more than 15 years in the adult industry, I can confidently say this is the most exploitative and discouraging platform I have ever worked with.

1. Extremely Low Pay (12%–27%)

The payout percentage are 12% and 27% — far below industry standards. For the exposure, reputational risk, and emotional labor involved, this compensation is simply unacceptable.

2. No Real Control Over Customers

Models are not truly free to refuse members. If someone has previously been rude or inappropriate, declining them is discouraged. Blocking a user requires written justification and meeting character minimums, which makes protecting yourself unnecessarily difficult. The pressure is to tolerate behaviour that should not be tolerated.

3. Permanent, Easily Abused Review System

Anyone can leave a review within two minutes of entering your room, and it remains permanently on your profile. This creates enormous vulnerability to bullying, coordinated down-rating, and retaliation.

There are long-time hosts who send their regular members to intentionally rate new or competing models poorly. Whether officially acknowledged or not, the system allows this behaviour to happen — and models have no recourse.

The psychological pressure of knowing your income depends on reviews that can be weaponized is extremely damaging and absurd.

4. “Hall of Fame” & Ranking Manipulation

The Hall of Fame and ranking system are heavily influenced by some performers artificially boosting their position and winning awards with fake accounts with referral 70%-100% structures recycling money rather than organic success.

This does not create a fair or transparent competitive environment. This creates an uneven playing field for genuine performers.

5. Chargebacks Still Exist

Models can complete work and later lose their earnings due to chargebacks. The financial risk is placed entirely on the performer.

Member Quality & Platform Culture

In my experience, the overall member quality has been extremely low compared to other platforms. Many users lack basic cam etiquette or awareness that they are interacting live with a real human being.

Rude, impatient, pushy behaviour is common. Most enter explicit immediately, act entitled, and behave as though models owe them something. There is very little culture of respect.

Recently, there has also been a noticeable trend of users requesting real-life meetings, fully aware that models are prohibited from sharing external contact information (Twitter, Snapchat, etc.). This puts performers in uncomfortable and stressful situations while exposing them to review retaliation when they refuse.

Most members behave as if models are possessions they have “trained” over years — not independent professionals.

Model Forums & Internal Environment

The model forums are filled with reports of constant technical problems and performers sitting in free live chat for hours — sometimes days — with no traffic while streaming publicly for free.

The atmosphere is discouraging and demoralizing.

This platform places the financial, emotional, and reputational risk entirely on the model while offering low pay, minimal protection, and a review system that can easily be abused.

After 15+ years in the industry, this has been the most disappointing professional experience of my career.

February 21, 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I would rename ImLive into IAmLazy

Lazy and greedy! This is the best description of ImLive models. I watched their shows about 10 times (different girls) and then I switched to JoySexFun.com
- their girls are beautiful inside and out lol and damn it, they are so more industrious workers! They have a very good understanding of what a man likes and how he wants to be treated. ImLive models usually don’t understand this at all and they don’t listen to you when you are trying to explain what you want. They rarely do what they promised. Time-wasters!

April 10, 2022
Unprompted review

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look