Mr. Imam is excellent, course is is not very good
The course is good, but there are disadvantages for me:
1. the course does not take into account the students' session, during the most stressful period (end of December, January) it was necessary to do final assignments, actively participate. I am studying at professional retraining courses, which are implemented by SFU together with Innopolis, and they arrange vacations there during the session. I would postpone the start of the course to September, because this is the easiest and most free time to fully master the course, and not in fits and starts and in a hurry.
2. Organization of classes. I need to know exactly how the score is formed, what needs to be done to get points. But at the beginning of the course, it was voiced very vaguely. The conditions were that there would be additional points for completing tasks during classes, but then this was forgotten, and in the final table with points, the tasks were simply evaluated, without additional points for activity
3. In addition to point 2: very little time is given for the final project on the flutter module, plus it was not clear that it was necessary to make two projects for the entire course, not one. And again, the deadline for the first project was at the end of December, when the session time.
4. The organizational point is that at the very beginning, 2 days were offered to choose from for classes, Saturday and Sunday, on Saturday the whole group was waiting for classes to start, but nothing happened. Then they magically changed that classes would be held only on Sundays. Which is very inconvenient. Wish: to set the current schedule immediately so as not to upset the students later.
5. Organization of educational videos in Moodle. In the second block on IT Product Development, the videos in the tabs with different topics are the same. I told the teacher about it, but he didn't change anything. Although the results are interesting.
In general, the teacher Mr. Imam is excellent, positive, answered all questions, explained the material well. Therefore, the teacher is rated 5. The course and its content are rated 3.
February 3, 2024
Unprompted review