Daily Mail Reviews 1,545

TrustScore 1 out of 5

1.2

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

Review summary

Created with AI, based on recent reviews

Most reviewers were let down by their experience overall. Many people were dissatisfied with the website, describing it as glitchy, unusable, and constantly refreshing, which made reading articles and leaving comments difficult. Customers also frequently reported issues with the content, noting a prevalence of celebrity gossip over serious news and concerns about biased reporting and censorship in the comments section. The subscription process was also a source of frustration, with users finding it cumbersome and difficult to access content even after paying. Some people were dissatisfied with the social media presence, specifically mentioning a lack of response from the company's sports department on Facebook. Additionally, some reviewers found the product, such as the crossword, to be problematic, with missing letters and other errors.

What people talk about most

Social media

Users describe negative interactions with social media. Many reviewers express dissatisfaction with the... See more

Website

Customers consistently express dissatisfaction with the website's functionality. Many reviewers report issues... See more

Product

Consumers express significant dissatisfaction with the product. Many reviewers find the content to be of low... See more

User experience

Customers had negative experiences with user experience. Many reviewers found the interface dysfunctional and... See more

Subscription

Reviewers express significant dissatisfaction with the subscription service. Many customers are questioning... See more

Reviews shaping this summary

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Mail has declined in content value within the past six months. Also went to subscription yet is easy enough to get around by archiving articles. Youy'll be banned if you post too many comments it does... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Perhaps someone from the DM "management" could respond to some of the views here (mine & others) ? Now they have invented another way to annoy its Readers , as well as disappearing reader's commen... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

DailyMail has become a celebrity rag. Unintresting stories about societies lowest class of individules. No one cares about morally bankrupt celebrities any more. Where are the hard hitting articles ab... See more


Company details

  1. News Service

Written by the company

MailOnline - all the latest news, sport, showbiz, science and health stories from around the world from the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers


Contact info

1.2

Bad

TrustScore 1 out of 5

2K reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Hasn’t replied to negative reviews

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Once Again Not Accessible

Once again the online paper is not accessible online! This seems to happen every week - what am I paying a subscription for if I cannot access the site? Also, the Comments section is only available for approximately the time it takes to read the top half of the paper, any articles lower down allegedly have no comments nor can you post any.

September 22, 2025
Unprompted review
Advertisement
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

The comments section on the Daily Mail…

The comments section on the Daily Mail need to be monitored or removed. It has opened it’s comments to anyone who accepts their tracking and advertising most especially Americans. The comments on certain women are vile , racist and incite hatred. This week there were photos of the Sussex children. The comments were not only unacceptable they were dangerous. The DM is spreading this hatred across the world. Comments calling these innocent children terrible names and making vile allegations on their parentage came from New Zealand, The US, South Africa, Dubai and lots more. The family live in the US and as we see daily there are shootings of innocent people by people who have been filled with hate by postings on the internet.

September 2, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Should be banned from publication

Recently I am coming across more and more hugely inappropriate and utterly disgusting comments left by your readers in regards to articles.

I, however, have had one removed stating “I am ashamed to be a human being when reading these comments”. How is that justified?

Yesterday, in response to the Catholic school shooting, a user had posted “shame it wasn’t a mosque” How can you possibly allow such a comment to be posted?! I logged a complaint but heard nothing.

I am on the verge of deleting your app because of this; it’s very distressing and upsetting that you are allowing this nastiness to go unfiltered.

Today I read a post in regard to Zara McDermott moving in with Louis Tomlinson “she’s a tramp who every man and his dog has had a go” How can you allow this?!!!

I am shocked, horrified and outraged at your lack of moral code and compass!!

August 28, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

The glitchy website is just appalling…

Horrible rank newspaper! What news? It’s not news, it’s a celebrity gossip magazine. It’s biased, bigoted, poorly written and researched. The glitchy website too is just appalling to negotiate. It frustratingly moves when you scroll up onto to the next article and refreshes the page after 5 minutes, so any comment in the process of being written is deleted.

The science and history articles can be interesting but they are rare. The smutty, tawdry, dirty obsession with celebrity low gutter gossip, Meghan Markle, Bonnie Blue, etc and American news not relevant to Britain really puts me off. What about UK issues? The paywall now extends to most of the site. I feel it often devalues women ; the “Female” section is just about looks, weight and sex; the emphasis being on how to please the male gaze.It’s deliberately salacious for clicks and profit. So I’m giving up with the DM and swapping to a better quality newspaper with competent journalism and well researched, more informed content.

August 18, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Serious journalism has deserted the…

Serious journalism has deserted the Daily Mail. It’s nothing but an extreme right-wing rag that serves as a mouthpiece for Farage and Reform. The Daily Hate has sunk to new depths with its constant attacks against the disabled, unemployed, poor and disadvantaged. Any newspaper that allows comments wishing immigrants - including babies and children dead, has sunk to new and disturbing depths. Joseph Goebbels would have been proud of this excuse for a ‘newspaper’. The historical echos with 1930/1940s Germany finds parallels with the ‘content’ of the Daily Mail. What a sad world we live in…

August 13, 2025
Unprompted review
Advertisement
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

The Daily Mail has got too big for its boots!

Last weekend, I attempted several times to leave a message (as others often do) at the end of news items on the Daily Mail’s online edition, first registering to do so. I received an automated email, informing me that my registration had been completed. However, I was surprised to find that instead of being allowed to use a pen-name of my own choosing, I was instead assigned a pseudonym that I didn’t like and which I cannot change: a clear “take-it-or-leave-it” attitude. Also, the procedure for leaving a short comment on its online “message-boards” is far from self-explanatory. For example, having typed in my message, it remained in a blue-shaded area for several minutes, but after looking at another news item on a different page, when I returned to the page where I’d posted my comment, it had gone! And that happened several times! Since then, I have emailed two different departments at the Daily Mail but both my emails were totally ignored. In short, the Daily Mail appears to be a very discourteous and arrogant newspaper that disparages its own readers' opinions. Bearing that in mind, I have now decided to avoid buying this newspaper in future. Come to think of it, we would probably all be a lot happier and healthier NOT reading the news or listening to it – especially British news, which only becomes more depressing with each passing day. That said, I see it doesn’t take long for the deranged Trotskyists to crawl out of the woodwork, who portray economic contractions, the mayhem over border control, surging crime rates, our toothless judiciary, as POSITIVE news!!!

August 12, 2025
Unprompted review
Advertisement
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I was brought up on DM

I was brought up on DM, through my Dad. I am now in my 50's and can't believe how biased this paper/online paper is.
If you try and leave a comment that they don't agree with 'house rules', it will not be printed. Also, if you are reading anything about immigration or the UK citizens standing up for their rights, there is no opportunity to comment.
Is DM a British Paper anymore?

July 24, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

The Daily Migrant

Daily Mail does not publish news. In fact having the audacity to call oneself a newspaper shows itself to not be fit for purpose. The articles are not researched and rely upon members of the 'public' (read 'public' as racist, white, British born bigots) to call or email the Daily Mail 'Have you got a story' line and then dictate the words to a four year old on an iPad who types it up with their eyes closed, it's then published two seconds after being written. The Daily Mail motto is 'Mmm' Migrants, Meghan and Migrants. In fact, I think in the interests of public transparency they really ought to consider changing their name to The Daily Migrant. That would better suit it's content. The comments section is awash with the dregs of society, racist little people lurking in the shadows who wouldn't have the audacity to say any of the things they do so under the luxury of anonymity they have online. This is a gross publication that is way past its sell by date.

July 20, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Pathetic Mail practice!

Pathetic Mail! started to write a response on a story on the web page then this Ad appears, have to wait and wait, if you try to erase it it takes over the page and then a notice comes on 'We value your privacy'
That's it mail just removed your page from my laptop, it's happened too many times!!!!

July 17, 2025
Unprompted review
Advertisement
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Beware

Beware, unsubscribing is nearly impossible, they will try every trick known to make you stay subscribed and to continue to bill you.

July 16, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Scum Newspaper

Posted an image of Diogo Jotas and Andre Silvas burnt out car, with what appeared to have remains inside still. Also harassed Rute, as she had to identify her husbands remains.

Scum newspaper, scum journalists, they should be banned and ashamed!

July 4, 2025
Unprompted review
Advertisement
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

DO NOT do an online subscription to the Daily Mail.

Strongly advise against subscribing to the Daily Mail online.
Once subscribed one has to put in a password EVERY time you want to access the paper on your subscription, even if using one's own home computer....BUT the really awful thing is that nearly EVERYTIME you want to access the paper, after putting in your email and password you get those ghastly square pictures with bikes; fire hydrants; bridges; buses and so on that you have to click on several pictures...BUT you do one OK and it just opens another, then another. I had SIX today before graciously being allowed into my subscription.
I realise they want to check I am a human, not a BOT, but we are not talking about accessing Fort Knox here, just my own subscription on my own home computer. My online banks access in a more customer friendly way.
It is just Not worth the hassle any more. No wonder they are losing subscribers, and frankly deserve to.

July 2, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

DAILY MAIL

DAILY MAIL
This paper has become a celebrity magazine. Its shameful to call itself a news provider. Been reading it as a preference for 15 years, its the worst news giver now, don't bother with it, unless you want to read only about celebrities. It does provide some humour though, as it is littered with typos, quality is now very poor.

June 30, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

The Daily Mail has gone downhill as…

The Daily Mail has gone downhill as rapidly as a skier in the Swiss alps. You now have to sift through all the celebrity trash to find the real news. I don’t care about Jeff Bezos wedding or Meghan Markle. Show the serious news first! I don’t know what happened to the Mail but I’m done.
Looking for other options now.

June 30, 2025
Unprompted review

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look