Wikipedia Reviews 

If their review of Alex Berenson is anything to go by, Wikipedia is laughable.

Paid false information, they are desperate for money so they will write whatever for the highest bid.

it's wikipedia. there's literally no other place to go for info on literally any subject and yet they've still not implemented ads or subscriptions or any other bs.

bad reviews are from people who don't believe a horse has 4 legs.

Wikipedia, the website that has opinions of others but if you have a different opinion that is not as positive you will get blocked!!! Most information is not accurate anyway and they always ask for donations. Other more accurate sources are widely available

Left radical totalitarian fascist brainwash propaganda. Most articles are fake and the left radical authors have full control and can manipulate as much as they want. Has nothing to do with neutral information. It's extremely one-sided leftist.

I used to really like reading wikipedia, but since they blocked my account for no obvious reason, and I can only complain if I log in, which is impossible to do, I really can't rate it above 3. At least they no longer accept my donations so it saves me money!

My ip address has been blocked for no f***ing reason. All I've done is corrected some pages. Wikipedia Wikipoodia more like

Good site with lots of info.
I use this site whenever I want to know anything from scratch.
I find this useful and informative

Wikipedia has to be neutral, sadly it is not. Wikipedia has been exposed, by Steven Crowder, as leftist shills. Wikipedia is now CNN.

Was good once. Sadly Wikipedia is now a political tool rather than a source of reliable information. Page editors inject their own bias which has degraded the experience. Like the media generally, you have to sift through the good and the bad with wikipedia, which is antithetical to the very idea of encyclopaedias.

The internet promised so much. In reality google and companies like wikipedia have become repositories of other peoples opinions—mostly B-grade academics with an axe to grind— and they get a disproportionately large audience for their small-mindedness.

Absolutely biased. Shameful and embarrassing just like the main stream media jokes of CNN and MSNBC.

A disgustingly and obviously biased website that claims to be neutral. They also pretend to be on the verge of going bankrupt, and "humbly" ask you for donations. Donations that they don't need. So, not only do they lie to you.... They think that you're so stupid that you're gonna donate money so they can lie to you even more. Funded by deep state co©️ksuckers.

It's all about money! As a new editor, I wanted to contribute and add a popular person. Spent hours and hours on writing a good article. Yes, it was really well made! They declined it like 5-6 times, because of "not notable sources" although I provided 20+ references from blogs and others. Little thing I noticed is that they said "YouTube is not a reliable source" although they publish pages with no references but a few YouTube links. We have all seen published pages of "celebrities" with no blog articles and no fame. You have to pay a reviewer to make it happen. Don't waste your time on this trash platform! Wikipedia is not what it used to be. Everybody is a reviewer nowadays. Some depressed kiddos with no friends.

For many years I used to donate to Wikipedia - not any more.

It has become clear that it has sadly been co-opted into a propaganda tool and outright smear campaign against many reputable scientists whose professional opinions contradict 'The Science'. Many have tried to correct errors on their web pages and complain that the page mysteriously reverts to its old form.

Other entries have been 'disappeared'.

It is sad that it is part of the political narrative-control machine, when it started as such an altruistic idea.

Why are Wikipedia so evil toward truth? Its writers slander people who are opposed to media lies. They are cowards and the truth will find you out. Co-conspirators to murder are the Wikipedia writers who slander and defame anti-covid narrative scientists and writers. Shame on you all.

Fake information site. While it appears to have some useful information their agenda is protecting criminals and Illegals while punishing hard working Americans. They believe in handouts for the lazy, overcrowding our Country, and idolizing thugs and criminals. Wikipedia promotes racism against whites and do not believe ALL lives matter. They post "Conspiracy theorist" on Republican's Info. This is a useless website run by ignorant sheep.

I would give Wikipedia a zero if it was available. They only post liberal nonsense about whoever they desire and when you call them out on it they claim nothing to do with it. It is just your average reader that contributes what a lot of garbage. I hope no one contributes to this biased bull crap! It should go far far away!!!!

I went on Wikipedia to check what it said about a prominent youtube star with a large following. There should have been a lot of information there but what was more prominent was a recent episode. I went on the "talk" button and found that several of their own editors had said the article was biased and one that it reads like a real hatchet job. Quite likely the subject could sue for defamation. I will certainly not be donating any more money to Wikipedia