Daily Mail Reviews 1,545

TrustScore 1 out of 5

1.2

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

Review summary

Created with AI, based on recent reviews

Most reviewers were let down by their experience overall. Many people were dissatisfied with the website, describing it as glitchy, unusable, and constantly refreshing, which made reading articles and leaving comments difficult. Customers also frequently reported issues with the content, noting a prevalence of celebrity gossip over serious news and concerns about biased reporting and censorship in the comments section. The subscription process was also a source of frustration, with users finding it cumbersome and difficult to access content even after paying. Some people were dissatisfied with the social media presence, specifically mentioning a lack of response from the company's sports department on Facebook. Additionally, some reviewers found the product, such as the crossword, to be problematic, with missing letters and other errors.

What people talk about most

Social media

Users describe negative interactions with social media. Many reviewers express dissatisfaction with the... See more

Website

Customers consistently express dissatisfaction with the website's functionality. Many reviewers report issues... See more

Product

Consumers express significant dissatisfaction with the product. Many reviewers find the content to be of low... See more

User experience

Customers had negative experiences with user experience. Many reviewers found the interface dysfunctional and... See more

Subscription

Reviewers express significant dissatisfaction with the subscription service. Many customers are questioning... See more

Reviews shaping this summary

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Mail has declined in content value within the past six months. Also went to subscription yet is easy enough to get around by archiving articles. Youy'll be banned if you post too many comments it does... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Perhaps someone from the DM "management" could respond to some of the views here (mine & others) ? Now they have invented another way to annoy its Readers , as well as disappearing reader's commen... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

DailyMail has become a celebrity rag. Unintresting stories about societies lowest class of individules. No one cares about morally bankrupt celebrities any more. Where are the hard hitting articles ab... See more


Company details

  1. News Service

Written by the company

MailOnline - all the latest news, sport, showbiz, science and health stories from around the world from the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers


Contact info

1.2

Bad

TrustScore 1 out of 5

2K reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Hasn’t replied to negative reviews

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

its just a celebrity rag now

its just a celebrity rag now. Full of trivia and tittle tattle. It defies the law of honesty calling itself a newspaper these days. Its mostly American articles or American celeb articles and sex articles.

April 17, 2025
Unprompted review
Advertisement
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

To the idiot that wrote the inaccurate piece describing Poundbury

As someone who has been lucky enough to live for some time in Poundbury, Dorchester, I can say with accuracy that the recent piece from the mail online, Locals reveal... is just a fairy story. To start, it is not a town; Dorchester, which we are part of, is a town. Poundbury is a fabulous place to live, a thriving, caring community with a mix of young and old and everything in between. Businesses are thriving, the cafes and restaurants serving wonderful local food are full. Lots of open spaces, countryside views yet with a school, doctors, vets, shops, interest groups and of course stunning architecture, this piece could not have been more inaccurate. It was obviously written by a very unhappy person, jealous of our beautiful community.

April 14, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Joke site

Joke site! you often cli.ck on something and it takes you to something completely different The profanity filter is a joke Often innocent comments are deleted while abusive hate messages and nudity/sex are permitted.They dont tell you if youve been banned so you waste your time posting stuff that never gets published!

April 3, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

A Rag

Used to be a readable Newspaper but has degenerated into a complete Joke, only interested in generating Advertising Revenue and employing young inexperienced would be Scribblers. Does not deserve to survive.

April 7, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

This so called paper has gone down hill…

This so called paper has gone down hill very very fast. It's like young kids are writing these reports just out of Uni. I was told that I got banned indefinitely for writing about how girls playing football was a bit silly really and I will not be allowed back on. I am also not allowed to Sign into my account or read any comments. If I had been calling for the death of someone or race of people then I can see that that could get me banned but a joke about girls football, really. The end is near for this paper and their downfall is there own making.

March 14, 2025
Unprompted review
Advertisement
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

How the mighty have fallen.

This site has gone from my favourite to least favourite in just a few months. The number of pop up adverts is simply a disgrace and spoils the whole experience. The launch in the US has been hugely detrimental with US readership on a totally different moral planet to the core readership; the comments are more akin to Germany in the 1930's ! As a news platform it's also highly immoral to block so many of the most relevant and important news articles behind a paywall. It prevents those who cannot afford a subscription from important issues and their views. It's a two tier system that enable as whole demographic to be marginalised. The illustrious Daily Mail should be highly embarrassed with this avoidable fall from grace.

March 28, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I have used them for a long time

I have used them for a long time, but no more. They have finally broken me with anger. I'm a regular commenter and am neutral, fair, even use light comic relief in my postings. I got a complaint and they removed it. I directed no offense to anybody, did not use foul language or anything offensive in law. Their journalistic quality has been going down for years and frankly it must be said their freemium model is pathetic, trying to make people pay. In the last year they have gone downhill, often posting stories that are unverified. Use any other news site, but don't bother with them. They are full of hate, stupidity, foul judgment and unfair left-wing bias.

March 21, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Daily Mail creates hate

Daily Mail creates hate within communities and people. They promote material that creates division. Read papers with a bit more honesty and transparency.

March 20, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 2 out of 5 stars

I deleted my profile as the DM has…

I deleted my profile as the DM has become too much, you can’t delete your comment if published, you can’t edit your comment, and are threatened with defamation if you aren’t careful. In the same stroke of the brush, people are allowed to call you names, and they are publish these. Seems freedom of speech is only for some…

March 19, 2025
Unprompted review
Advertisement
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

They just make up stuff now

Writes non stories and journalists (if you can call them that) just make up stuff eg:claiming dyslexia doesn’t exist. An absolute joke of a paper not to mention the grammar is awful.

March 13, 2025
Unprompted review
Advertisement
Rated 2 out of 5 stars

it would appear that contributors…

it would appear that contributors comments to the Mail  (there are many) which in any way can be construed as "negative" about the continuous promotion of the saintly Kate (Princess of "Wales)are not published ,excuses are "page not available"  or "no one has yet commented"( not true,) "please  try later " amongst  others, however  vicious and negative presumptions comments by contributors , many  racists and deeply offensive, on Meghan (Duchess of Sussex) are allowed, the publication seems biased and does not allow debating comments, and one cannot reasonably out rule censorship with  out prior notice ?

March 11, 2025
Unprompted review
Advertisement
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Missing the Share Prices…

I am not critisizing the app as I don't use it and read the proper newspaper. What I cannot understand is why they have taken the business page showing the share prices off the paper and put it on the app. There must be tens of thousands of older readers who look at this page daily and who are now unable to do so. I enjoy the Daily Mail and read the headlines, weather, sport and enjoy doing the Quick Crossword along with the Share prices and also the Bridge column. Please have a re-think on the Share page and re-install it for us older readers. Thank you

March 7, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Is the pen mightier than the sword?

Oh my!

The DM is ran by the gonks that used to work in the Treacle Mines. Well it can’t be anyone who is human, maybe now with AI the chimps are on their way to Shakespeare but are busy making up content.

Things I have discovered:

Katy Hind is married to Jermaine Jenas, sort out your headlines

Some stories are the same ie Gene Hackman died earlier, no extra information so a new paragraph of word salad is added each day.

The previous article is not updated from the present to the past.

Too often the chimps are using AI and articles are flowing with higher order adjectives that are superfluous to the article, for example; Seen at Clarkson’s farm was Milly Sidebotham who was dressed in a glossy red mac, wearing boots by Barbour as also worn by Georgia Toffalo. Her glossy hair was dyed a beautiful Titian red with subtle highlights of gold which was mirrored in her Chanel lipstick which has stood the rest of time. Just state that a lady, which is not news, went to a farm, still boring.

Papers should reflect the news and not tittle tattle. The truth needs to be read not opinions.

Try not to be political.

It’s dreadful paying for M+ subscription, the quality is not good enough to charge for.

Try not to put old articles in as new. Recently there was a murder case but it was from thirty years ago.

A great idea would be to add the puzzle pages to the app.

Ensure that the comments can be accessed. Often I type, then the page jumps back to the article a couple of times but usually would return to the comment page. The last two weeks I have seen the jumping/twitching occur the. I’m bounced out of the comments.

For real up to date articles I read the Daily Express and The Sun. Ai ai ai, the Mirror has an even longer set of decades that are ‘current’

Captions are copy pasted text from the main article.

Often paragraphs are copy and pasted text. Think about employing a proofreader as the quality and is missing.

Finally, when typing speech, you start with speech marks yet I’ve never seen them to close a speech, strange but maybe the chimps are not aware of SPaG, Spelling Punctuation and Grammar.

Normally, education endeavour and succeeds in being mightier but with the apes, I’d like to remove their fingers to prevent them from typing. On this occasion the sword is mightier than the pen.

March 6, 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Terrible

Terrible, just utterly trash! Scare stories, biased and geared towards the left and woke deadbeats. They never publish any messages that do not fit there agenda. Can not even like or dislike now.

March 4, 2025
Unprompted review

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look