Denied claim over ‘repair vs replacement’ loophole despite cracked screen
I purchased a PureGear screen protector with the Pure Pledge program expecting coverage if my screen was damaged. My phone screen ended up cracking, and I had to go through insurance and pay a $100 deductible to replace the device.
My claim was denied because the phone was “replaced instead of repaired,” even though the cost was directly due to screen damage. This feels like a technical loophole that defeats the purpose of the protection being offered.
The process itself was also unnecessarily difficult. You have to register the product after installation, then go through a lengthy claims process and provide multiple documents, only to be denied based on fine print that isn’t clearly emphasized at the time of purchase.
Between the confusing requirements, the time involved, and the denial despite legitimate damage and out-of-pocket cost, this program does not provide the value it suggests. I would not recommend relying on it.








